Covid-vaxx zealot and former tennis champion, Martina Navratilova, gets turbo-charged, two-site cancer.

Cancer is a documented outcome of the Covid vaxx

Eighteen-times Grand Slam winner in the 1970s/1980s, Martina Navratilova, aged 66, has just announced she has been diagnosed with both breast and throat cancer and will not be able to travel for media commentary duty for the 2023 Australian Open which commences soon.  So, she will not be calling any matches involving Novak Djokovic who is back in Australia this year after having his three-year immigration ban overturned following his theatrical deportation from Australia for last year’s Open because he was unperforated with the Covid vaxx.

There is a whiff of irony in the air over this development because vaxxed-to-the-max Navratilova hounded Djokovic in 2021 and 2022 for his disobedience to the Goo Of Deliverance (GOD):  “you have two choices, get vaccinated or just don’t go play”, she said, urging Djokovic to get the needle or stay home from the 2022 Australian Open.  “I couldn’t wait to get vaccinated”, she said at the time, because “I would be much more scared of getting sick from not being vaccinated than whatever side effects I might have from the vaccination”.

“It’s like playing Russian Roulette with your body much more so getting Covid than getting vaccinated,” she added.  “Just got my second Pfizer vaccination today so a huge week for me… #vaccinate if you can, please!”, she excitedly twittered in March 2021, adding that she would take the boosters as soon as she could.  “Please hurt me so I know I really got it!!!” she said of the jab, with three exclamation marks for added emphasis.  So, Djokovic should “take one for the team”, too, because “the bottom line is, sometimes your personal beliefs have to be trumped by what’s good for the greater good, for those around you, for your peers,” she said.

Well, now evidence is emerging that the Covid vaxx is seeing a surge in cancers, new and rebound (as well as other adverse events such as the better-publicised cardiac arrest died suddenlies (or coinciditis, as we are led to believe because they mostly occur in the vaxxed).  Two invaluable Substackers, Dr. Jessica Rose (IgC4 and cancer - a mechanism of action) and Dr. Colleen Huber (How Covid vaccines cause cancer) delve into the complex science of it for those who want a full intellectual immersion but the Unbekoming Substack emanating from out of Sydney has a good layman’s summary of the vaxx-cancer issue.

The repeated jabbing with spike protein, says Unbekoming, causes so much cell tissue damage resulting in chronic inflammation that the body’s immune system is forced to concentrate its resources on one particular type of antibody, IgG4, which is a specialist at reducing inflammation.  This leaves all the other antibodies in short supply, including the antibodies which ordinarily deal with neutralisation and disposal of all the wonky, and therefore potentially cancerous, copies of the body’s cells which are always dividing and reproducing, mostly identically but not always.  These mutant/cancerous cells make hay whilst the immune system is focused on the endless wave of injections of toxic spike protein.

The result is record-breaking incidence of new and old cancers following administration of the Covid vaxx schedule.  Even before the boosters (which make the situation far worse) were rolled out in the US, says Dr Huber, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) showed vastly more cancers following Covid vaccines than for all other vaccines during the thirty-year history of VAERS, accounting for 97.3% of all vaccine-related cancers reported.  Covid vaxx-induced breast cancer (one of the two that the unlucky Navratilova now has) accounted for 96.8% of all vaxx-related cancers.

Direct causation for any given individual for a long-latency vaccine injury like cancer is harder to prove than for more immediate and dramatic vaxx injuries but we can say that, given the mounting evidence of vaccine harm (including cancer) and the authorities’ desire to ignore the issue into oblivion, it is probable that Navratilova’s two cancers are related to her imbibing of all available Covid vaxxes.  She had had breast cancer before, in 2010, which was successfully treated with radiation therapy so it had been in remission for over a decade - until the Covid jabs were rolled out.

Her bonus throat cancer is also a red flag for the culpability of the Covid vaxx – or should be, despite The Narrative’s defenders trying to portray two-site cancers as par for the course.  CNN, for example, reports that “2% to 17% of people with cancer will have multiple primaries, or multiple kinds of cancers”.  So, the message is that Navratilova’s double cancer diagnosis is not at all unusual and the Covid vaxx is entirely innocent.  How dare you even suggest such a thing.  But if that lower range estimate of 2% for getting a double cancer is accurate then how unlucky would Navratilova have to be to be that one in fifty people.

Navratilova isn’t connecting the vaxx and cancer dots – her vaxx fetish prevents her from recognising what she (or Big Pharma, more accurately) has done by getting jabbed.  Nor is she showing much chops as a moral philosopher or political scientist.  Originally from then-Stalinist Czechoslovakia, Navratilova defected  to the US in 1975 where she inveighed against the “centralization of government power and loss of personal freedom” in the old country compared to the ‘land of the free’.  She is a supporter of abortion rights and a woman’s freedom to choose.

The morning dew, however, shows more staying power than Navratilova’s commitment to freedom and liberty which swiftly evaporated when it came into contact with an overblown fear of a virus and love of the vaxx and its authoritarian ways - Navratilova is a  Democrat (she has donated more than $25,000 to Democratic election campaigns) so her reaction is naturally way out of whack with viral reality and political ethics.

Get jabbed, or no tennis for you, she lectured Djokovic – “claiming your bodily autonomy is fine. But you cannot impose that on a country, it just doesn’t work that way”, she tweeted in September 2022 (Navratilova still not impressed with Serbian star's vaccination stance).  But, imposing mandatory vaccination (no jab no job, no jab no lob) on a country is just the ticket, apparently  Quite the little Stalinist, our Martina, despite her change of residence.

Just think - Novak was kept from Australia in January 2022 because he wasn’t vaxxed but Navratilova is now kept from Australia because she is.  I’m sure Novak, the bookies’ favourite for the 2023 Open in the (formerly forbidden, for him) city of Melbourne, would have too much grace to indulge in any schadenfreude (and we would all sincerely wish Martina the best in her new match against cancer) but we can at least note the irony around the fate of the two antagonists.